Pages

2025/08/29

UNNS: Formal Algebraic Structure of Nests

๐Ÿ›️ UNNS: Formal Algebraic Structure

Mathematical Framework for Nested Number Sequence Algebras

๐Ÿ“ Fundamental Algebraic Definitions

UNNS nests form algebraic structures with well-defined operations, identities, and morphisms. Each nest N induces an algebra over the domain of modulus values.

Definition 1: UNNS Nest Algebra
Let ๐’ฉโ‚™ = (๐”ฝโ‚™, ∘, e) where:
• ๐”ฝโ‚™ = {f(m,n) : m ∈ โ„ค⁺} (the nest function space)
• ∘ : ๐”ฝโ‚™ × ๐”ฝโ‚™ → ๐”ฝโ‚™ (composition operation)
• e ∈ ๐”ฝโ‚™ (identity element)

Definition 2: Nest Homomorphism
ฯ† : ๐’ฉโ‚˜ → ๐’ฉโ‚™ is a nest homomorphism if:
ฯ†(a ∘แต b) = ฯ†(a) ∘โฟ ฯ†(b) for all a, b ∈ ๐’ฉโ‚˜

Definition 3: Integer-Preserving Subgroup
๐”ฆโ‚™ = {f(kn,n) : k ∈ โ„ค⁺} ⊆ ๐’ฉโ‚™
Forms a subgroup under UNNS composition
Group Structure

UNNS nests exhibit group-like properties under specific operations, with well-defined closure, associativity, and identity elements.

Closure: f(a,n) ∘ f(b,n) ∈ ๐’ฉโ‚™
Associativity: (a ∘ b) ∘ c = a ∘ (b ∘ c)
Identity: ∃e ∈ ๐’ฉโ‚™ : a ∘ e = e ∘ a = a
Inverses: ∀a ∈ ๐’ฉโ‚™, ∃a⁻¹ : a ∘ a⁻¹ = e
Ring Properties

UNNS algebras form ring structures with addition and multiplication operations that preserve nest relationships.

(๐’ฉโ‚™, +, ·) forms a ring where:
• (๐’ฉโ‚™, +) is an abelian group
• (๐’ฉโ‚™, ·) is a monoid
• Distributivity: a·(b+c) = a·b + a·c
Isomorphisms

Structural equivalences between different nests reveal deep mathematical relationships and classification theorems.

๐’ฉโ‚š ≅ ๐’ฉโ‚‘ iff p ≡ q (mod ฯ†(lcm(p,q)))
where ฯ† is Euler's totient function
⟨⟩
Generated Substructures

Prime nest values generate maximal substructures, while composite nests decompose into product structures.

⟨f(p,p)⟩ generates ๐’ฉโ‚š when p is prime
๐’ฉโ‚šโ‚‘ ≅ ๐’ฉโ‚š × ๐’ฉโ‚‘ when gcd(p,q) = 1

๐Ÿงฎ Interactive Algebraic Structure Explorer

Nest Configuration
Structure Analysis
Morphism Testing
Closure Property
Operations remain within the nest algebra
((∘))
Associativity
Grouping doesn't affect results
๐ž
Identity Element
Neutral element for operations
⁻¹
Inverse Elements
Undoing operations
Commutativity
Order independence
Distributivity
Distribution over addition

๐Ÿ”„ Structural Isomorphisms and Classifications

๐’ฉ₃
ฯ†
๐’ฉ₅
ฯˆ
๐’ฉ₇


Morphism chain: Prime nests under cross-validation mappings
๐Ÿ“ Structural Invariants

Order: |๐’ฉโ‚™| = ∞ (infinite nest algebras)

Rank: rank(๐’ฉโ‚™) = ⌊log₂(n)⌋ + 1 (generator complexity)

Integer Density: ฮด(๐’ฉโ‚™) = 1/n (density of integer-preserving elements)

Cross-Nest Degree: deg(๐’ฉโ‚˜, ๐’ฉโ‚™) = gcd(m,n) (structural connection strength)

๐ŸŽฏ Classification Theorem

Theorem (UNNS Classification):
Every UNNS nest algebra ๐’ฉโ‚™ is isomorphic to exactly one of:

Type I (Prime Nests): ๐’ฉโ‚š ≅ โ„คโ‚š[x]/(x² - (p+1)²x + p²)
• Simple structure, no proper subalgebras
• Maximal integer-preserving density

Type II (Prime Power Nests): ๐’ฉ₍โ‚šแต₎ ≅ ∏แตข₌₁แต ๐’ฉโ‚š
• Direct product of prime nest algebras
• Nilpotent elements present

Type III (Composite Nests): ๐’ฉ₍โ‚˜โ‚™₎ ≅ ๐’ฉโ‚˜ ⊗ ๐’ฉโ‚™ when gcd(m,n) = 1
• Tensor product structure
• Decomposable into coprime factors

Proof Strategy:
1. Show UNNS formula respects prime factorization
2. Establish Chinese Remainder Theorem for nests
3. Prove uniqueness via structural invariants
UNNS — Formal Algebraic Structure, Examples & Interactive Proofs

1. Rigorous definitions

We keep definitions minimal and precise so theorems directly follow from classical algebra.

1.1 The algebraic model

Let n ≥ 2.
- Z_n denotes the ring Z / nZ (integers modulo n).
- Z_n is a Z-module and is cyclic, generated by [1].
- N_n := End_Z(Z_n) = {Z-linear maps ฯ†: Z_n → Z_n }.
Claim: Every ฯ† ∈ N_n is multiplication by some k ∈ Z_n:
        ฯ†([x]) = [k·x]  (for all x), uniquely determined by k = ฯ†([1]).
Therefore N_n ≅ Z_n as rings via k ↦ (x ↦ k·x).
    

1.2 Types (algebraic classification)

  1. Type I: n is prime p. Then Z_n ≅ F_p field; N_n ≅ F_p (a field).
  2. Type II: n = p^e (prime power). Then Z_n is a local ring; N_n ≅ Z/p^eZ is local (has unique maximal ideal pZ/p^eZ).
  3. Type III: n composite with ≥2 distinct prime factors. By CRT, N_n ≅ ∏ Z/p_i^{e_i} (product of smaller rings).

2. Theorems & proof sketches

Theorem (Endomorphism identification)

Statement: N_n = End_Z(Z_n) ≅ Z_n via k ↦ (x ↦ kx).

Proof sketch: Z_n as Z-module is generated by [1]. Any Z-linear map ฯ† is determined by ฯ†([1]) = k ∈ Z_n. For any x ∈ Z_n, x = m·[1], so ฯ†(x)=m·ฯ†([1]) = m·k = k·x. Uniqueness: different k's give different maps. Composition corresponds to multiplication of residues: (k∘โ„“)(x) = k(โ„“ x)=kโ„“ x. Thus ring isomorphism.

Theorem (CRT decomposition)

Statement: If n = ∏ p_i^{e_i}, then Z_n ≅ ∏ Z_{p_i^{e_i}} and hence N_n ≅ ∏ N_{p_i^{e_i}} ≅ ∏ Z_{p_i^{e_i}}.

Proof sketch: The classical Chinese Remainder Theorem gives an explicit isomorphism Z/nZ → ∏ Z/p_i^{e_i} by reduction maps x ↦ (x mod p_i^{e_i}). Passing to End_Z(−) and using functoriality (End respects finite products), End(Z/nZ) ≅ End(∏ Z/p_i^{e_i}) ≅ ∏ End(Z/p_i^{e_i}). By the previous theorem End(Z/p^e Z) ≅ Z/p^e Z. Combine to obtain the product decomposition.

3. Worked examples (interactive)

Enter n and click Analyze n. The page factors n, shows the CRT decomposition, a representative isomorphism, and the multiplication (composition) table of N_n.

4. Concrete example: n = 12 (worked through)

n = 12 = 2^2 · 3. CRT: Z/12Z ≅ Z/4Z × Z/3Z. Therefore N_12 ≅ Z/4Z × Z/3Z, i.e. endomorphisms correspond to pairs (a mod 4, b mod 3) and composition is pairwise multiplication.

5. Visual proof element

Below: interactive circle representing residues mod n; colors mark CRT components. Click residues to see their component residues and see composition act as multiplication.

6. Composition / Morphism tests

Pick a, b then compute a∘b (composition) which corresponds to ab (mod n). The interactive table below shows the multiplication table in N_n (same as Z_n multiplication).

7. Further remarks (UNNS-specific ideas & next steps)

If your original UNNS usage envisaged non-Z-linear maps (e.g., shift/rotate/chunk operations), we can extend the algebra beyond N_n to the full monoid of functions Func(Z_n,Z_n). That monoid is far larger (n^n elements) and decompositions require different techniques (Young subgroups, permutation module theory). The core formalization above shows a minimal and provable foundation; extensions can be layered on top with explicit examples.